Purpose of the Bridge
Before moving from Daniel into Revelation, we need to stop long enough to identify what Daniel has taught us to see. Revelation does not invent an entirely new prophetic language. John writes as a Christian prophet whose imagination has been formed by Israel's Scriptures, and Daniel supplies some of the most important vocabulary through which John describes empire, persecution, heavenly judgment, the Son of Man, measured periods of oppression, resurrection, and the final kingdom of God.
The purpose of this bridge is therefore hermeneutical rather than merely chronological. We are not attempting to construct a chart that forces every symbol in Daniel into a one-to-one correspondence with a symbol in Revelation. We are establishing the canonical vocabulary that Revelation assumes. When John describes beasts, horns, books, a heavenly court, Michael, a period of forty-two months, 1,260 days, a blasphemous ruler, persecution of the saints, and the final destruction of beastly power, the reader who knows Daniel hears familiar language.
This bridge is also the proper place to deal carefully with Antiochus IV Epiphanes. He cannot simply be bypassed on the way to a future Antichrist, because Daniel 8 and Daniel 11 unmistakably place substantial prophetic attention upon the Seleucid crisis. At the same time, Antiochus cannot simply exhaust the biblical pattern, because Jesus, Paul, and Revelation reuse Daniel's language after Antiochus was dead. Antiochus is therefore historically real, exegetically indispensable, and canonically typological.
I. The Path of the Gentiles: From Jerusalem's Defeat to the Kingdom of Christ
Daniel begins with a historical event that appears, from the earthly perspective, to place the God of Israel on the losing side of history. Nebuchadnezzar comes to Jerusalem, besieges it, and carries vessels from the house of God to the house of his god (Daniel 1:1–2). The God of Israel appears to have been defeated by the gods of Babylon.
The book's entire theological argument is a sustained refutation of that appearance. The Lord gave Jehoiakim into Nebuchadnezzar's hand (Daniel 1:2). God removes kings and establishes kings (Daniel 2:21). The Most High is ruler over the realm of mankind (Daniel 4:17, 25, 32). The Ancient of Days sits in judgment and the Son of Man receives an everlasting dominion (Daniel 7:9–14). The faithful dead will rise to everlasting life (Daniel 12:2).
This is the path of the Gentiles: the period in which Gentile kingdoms dominate the historical stage, from Babylon through Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome, until the God of heaven establishes a kingdom that will never be destroyed. Daniel does not tell us that this period will be comfortable for the people of God. It tells us that it is governed, that it is bounded, and that it ends with the vindication of the faithful and the judgment of beastly power.
II. Antiochus IV: Historical Embodiment and Canonical Type
Antiochus IV Epiphanes is not an inconvenient historical detour in biblical prophecy. He is the clearest historical embodiment in Daniel of the kind of sacrilegious, self-exalting, persecuting power that Scripture later uses as a pattern for subsequent and climactic opposition to God. The bridge to Revelation must pass through Antiochus rather than around him.
Antiochus desecrated the Jerusalem Temple in 167 BC. He erected an altar to Zeus Olympios, sacrificed pigs on the altar, prohibited Jewish religious practice, and attempted to force the Jewish population to abandon their covenant identity. Daniel 8 and Daniel 11 describe this persecution with remarkable specificity. The 2,300 evenings and mornings of Daniel 8:14 and the 1,150 days of the Antiochene desecration are historically connected.
Yet Jesus uses the phrase "abomination of desolation" from Daniel in His Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24:15; Mark 13:14), applying it to a future event. Paul describes a man of lawlessness who takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God (2 Thessalonians 2:3–4), drawing upon the same Danielic portrait. Revelation describes a beast who speaks blasphemies against God, makes war with the saints, and exercises authority for forty-two months (Revelation 13:5–7).
The canonical pattern is clear: Antiochus is the historical prototype of a recurring and finally climactic form of sacrilegious, self-exalting opposition to God. He is not the only fulfillment; he is the first clear historical embodiment of a pattern that Scripture traces forward.
III. Daniel's Vocabulary in Revelation
The book of Revelation is saturated with Danielic vocabulary. The four beasts of Daniel 7 reappear in Revelation 13, combined into a single composite beast that embodies the characteristics of all four. The little horn's blasphemous speech and war against the saints (Daniel 7:8, 21, 25) reappear in the beast's blasphemies and war against the saints (Revelation 13:5–7). The measured period of "a time, times, and half a time" (Daniel 7:25; 12:7) reappears as forty-two months and 1,260 days (Revelation 11:2–3; 12:6, 14; 13:5).
The Son of Man who comes with the clouds of heaven (Daniel 7:13) reappears in Revelation 1:7 and 14:14. The Ancient of Days (Daniel 7:9) informs the description of the one seated on the throne in Revelation 4–5. The books that are opened in the heavenly court (Daniel 7:10) reappear in the book of life and the books of judgment in Revelation 20:12.
Michael, who stands guard over Daniel's people (Daniel 12:1) and assists the heavenly messenger against the prince of Persia (Daniel 10:13), appears in Revelation 12:7 leading the heavenly army against the dragon. The resurrection of Daniel 12:2 informs the first and second resurrections of Revelation 20.
This is not coincidence or superficial borrowing. John writes as a prophet who has been formed by Israel's Scriptures, and Daniel is one of the primary texts through which he understands the nature of empire, persecution, heavenly judgment, and the final kingdom of God.
IV. What Daniel Teaches Us to See in Revelation
Daniel teaches us to see several things that are essential for reading Revelation. First, it teaches us that beastly empires are temporary. However terrifying they appear from earth, they are accountable before the heavenly court. The Ancient of Days sits in judgment. The books are opened. The dominion of the beast is taken away.
Second, it teaches us that the Son of Man receives an everlasting dominion. The kingdoms of men rise and fall; the kingdom of the Son of Man will not be destroyed. Revelation's vision of the new Jerusalem and the reign of Christ is the fulfillment of what Daniel saw in the heavenly courtroom.
Third, it teaches us that the faithful who suffer under beastly empires will be vindicated. The wise who are killed will shine like the stars forever (Daniel 12:3). The saints who are overcome by the little horn will ultimately possess the kingdom (Daniel 7:22, 27). Revelation's promise that the martyrs will reign with Christ (Revelation 20:4–6) is the fulfillment of Daniel's promise of resurrection and vindication.
Fourth, it teaches us that the measured periods of persecution are bounded. The little horn operates for a time, times, and half a time (Daniel 7:25). The 1,290 days and 1,335 days of Daniel 12 are specific, bounded periods. Revelation's forty-two months and 1,260 days carry the same theological message: the persecution is real, but it is not eternal. God has already determined when it will end.
The path of the Gentiles, which began with Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem, ends with the establishment of the kingdom that will never be destroyed. Daniel has shown us the beginning of that path and the certainty of its end. Revelation shows us the end itself.
Discussion Questions
- 1.
What does it mean to say that the purpose of the Prophetic Bridge is "hermeneutical rather than merely chronological"?
- 2.
How is Antiochus IV Epiphanes both a historical referent and a canonical type? Why must the bridge to Revelation pass through Antiochus rather than around him?
- 3.
Identify three specific ways in which Daniel's vocabulary reappears in Revelation. What does this canonical relationship reveal about how John understood his prophetic task?
- 4.
What four things does Daniel teach us to see in Revelation, according to this study?
- 5.
How does the concept of "the path of the Gentiles" provide a framework for understanding the relationship between Daniel and Revelation?